Let L/k be a finite extension of fields, and X a variety defined over L. The functor ${\displaystyle \operatorname {Res} _{L/k}X}$  from k-schemes^op to sets is defined by

${\displaystyle \operatorname {Res} _{L/k}X(S)=X(S\times _{k}L)}$ 

(In particular, the k-rational points of ${\displaystyle \operatorname {Res} _{L/k}X}$  are the L-rational points of X.) The variety that represents this functor is called the restriction of scalars, and is unique up to unique isomorphism if it exists.

From the standpoint of sheaves of sets, restriction of scalars is just a pushforward along the morphism ${\displaystyle \operatorname {Spec} (L)\to \operatorname {Spec} (k)}$  and is right adjoint to fiber product of schemes, so the above definition can be rephrased in much more generality. In particular, one can replace the extension of fields by any morphism of ringed topoi, and the hypotheses on X can be weakened to e.g. stacks. This comes at the cost of having less control over the behavior of the restriction of scalars.

Alternative definition edit

Let ${\displaystyle h:S'\to S}$  be a morphism of schemes. For a ${\displaystyle S'}$ -scheme ${\displaystyle X}$ , if the contravariant functor

${\displaystyle \operatorname {Res} _{S'/S}(X):\mathbf {Sch/S} ^{op}\to \mathbf {Set} ,\quad T\mapsto \operatorname {Hom} _{S'}(T\times _{S}S',X)}$ 

is representable, then we call the corresponding ${\displaystyle S}$ -scheme, which we also denote with ${\displaystyle \operatorname {Res} _{S'/S}(X)}$ , the Weil restriction of ${\displaystyle X}$  with respect to ${\displaystyle h}$ .^[1]

Where ${\displaystyle \mathbf {Sch/S} ^{op}}$  denotes the dual of the category of schemes over a fixed scheme ${\displaystyle S}$ .

For any finite extension of fields, the restriction of scalars takes quasiprojective varieties to quasiprojective varieties. The dimension of the resulting variety is multiplied by the degree of the extension.

Under appropriate hypotheses (e.g., flat, proper, finitely presented), any morphism ${\displaystyle T\to S}$  of algebraic spaces yields a restriction of scalars functor that takes algebraic stacks to algebraic stacks, preserving properties such as Artin, Deligne-Mumford, and representability.

Simple examples are the following:

1. Let L be a finite extension of k of degree s. Then ${\displaystyle \operatorname {Res} _{L/k}(\operatorname {Spec} (L))=\operatorname {Spec} (k)}$  and ${\displaystyle \operatorname {Res} _{L/k}\mathbb {A} ^{1}}$  is an s-dimensional affine space ${\displaystyle \mathbb {A} ^{s}}$  over Spec k.
2. If X is an affine L-variety, defined by
   $${\displaystyle X=\operatorname {Spec} L[x_{1},\dots ,x_{n}]/(f_{1},\dotsc ,f_{m});}$$

    
   we can write ${\displaystyle \operatorname {Res} _{L/k}X}$  as Spec ${\displaystyle k[y_{i,j}]/(g_{l,r})}$ , where ${\displaystyle y_{i,j}}$  (${\displaystyle 1\leq i\leq n,1\leq j\leq s}$ ) are new variables, and ${\displaystyle g_{l,r}}$  (${\displaystyle 1\leq l\leq m,1\leq r\leq s}$ ) are polynomials in ${\displaystyle y_{i,j}}$  given by taking a k-basis ${\displaystyle e_{1},\dotsc ,e_{s}}$  of L and setting ${\displaystyle x_{i}=y_{i,1}e_{1}+\dotsb +y_{i,s}e_{s}}$  and ${\displaystyle f_{t}=g_{t,1}e_{1}+\dotsb +g_{t,s}e_{s}}$ .

If a scheme is a group scheme then any Weil restriction of it will be as well. This is frequently used in number theory, for instance:

1. The torus
   $${\displaystyle \mathbb {S} :=\operatorname {Res} _{\mathbb {C} /\mathbb {R} }\mathbb {G} _{m}}$$

    
   where ${\displaystyle \mathbb {G} _{m}}$  denotes the multiplicative group, plays a significant role in Hodge theory, since the Tannakian category of real Hodge structures is equivalent to the category of representations of ${\displaystyle \mathbb {S} .}$  The real points have a Lie group structure isomorphic to ${\displaystyle \mathbb {C} ^{\times }}$ . See Mumford–Tate group.
2. The Weil restriction ${\displaystyle \operatorname {Res} _{L/k}\mathbb {G} }$  of a (commutative) group variety ${\displaystyle \mathbb {G} }$  is again a (commutative) group variety of dimension ${\displaystyle [L:k]\dim \mathbb {G} ,}$  if L is separable over k. Aleksander Momot applied Weil restrictions of commutative group varieties with ${\displaystyle k=\mathbb {R} }$  and ${\displaystyle L=\mathbb {C} }$  in order to derive new results in transcendence theory which were based on the increase in algebraic dimension.^{[citation needed]}
3. Restriction of scalars on abelian varieties (e.g. elliptic curves) yields abelian varieties, if L is separable over k. James Milne used this to reduce the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture for abelian varieties over all number fields to the same conjecture over the rationals.
4. In elliptic curve cryptography, the Weil descent attack uses the Weil restriction to transform a discrete logarithm problem on an elliptic curve over a finite extension field L/K, into a discrete log problem on the Jacobian variety of a hyperelliptic curve over the base field K, that is potentially easier to solve because of K's smaller size.

Restriction of scalars is similar to the Greenberg transform, but does not generalize it, since the ring of Witt vectors on a commutative algebra A is not in general an A-algebra.

The original reference is Section 1.3 of Weil's 1959-1960 Lectures, published as:

• Andre Weil. "Adeles and Algebraic Groups", Progress in Math. 23, Birkhäuser 1982. Notes of Lectures given 1959-1960.

Other references:

• Siegfried Bosch, Werner Lütkebohmert, Michel Raynaud. "Néron models", Springer-Verlag, Berlin 1990.
• James S. Milne. "On the arithmetic of abelian varieties", Invent. Math. 17 (1972) 177-190.
• Martin Olsson. "Hom stacks and restriction of scalars", Duke Math J., 134 (2006), 139–164. http://math.berkeley.edu/~molsson/homstackfinal.pdf
• Bjorn Poonen. "Rational points on varieties", http://math.mit.edu/~poonen/papers/Qpoints.pdf
• Nigel Smart, Weil descent page with bibliography, https://homes.esat.kuleuven.be/~nsmart/weil_descent.html
• Aleksander Momot, "Density of rational points on commutative group varieties and small transcendence degree", https://arxiv.org/abs/1011.3368