KNOWPIA
WELCOME TO KNOWPIA

In mathematical physics, the **WKB approximation** or **WKB method** is a method for finding approximate solutions to linear differential equations with spatially varying coefficients. It is typically used for a semiclassical calculation in quantum mechanics in which the wavefunction is recast as an exponential function, semiclassically expanded, and then either the amplitude or the phase is taken to be changing slowly.

The name is an initialism for **Wentzel–Kramers–Brillouin**. It is also known as the **LG** or **Liouville–Green method**. Other often-used letter combinations include **JWKB** and **WKBJ**, where the "J" stands for Jeffreys.

This method is named after physicists Gregor Wentzel, Hendrik Anthony Kramers, and Léon Brillouin, who all developed it in 1926.^{[1]} In 1923, mathematician Harold Jeffreys had developed a general method of approximating solutions to linear, second-order differential equations, a class that includes the Schrödinger equation. The Schrödinger equation itself was not developed until two years later, and Wentzel, Kramers, and Brillouin were apparently unaware of this earlier work, so Jeffreys is often neglected credit. Early texts in quantum mechanics contain any number of combinations of their initials, including WBK, BWK, WKBJ, JWKB and BWKJ. An authoritative discussion and critical survey has been given by Robert B. Dingle.^{[2]}

Earlier appearances of essentially equivalent methods are: Francesco Carlini in 1817, Joseph Liouville in 1837, George Green in 1837, Lord Rayleigh in 1912 and Richard Gans in 1915. Liouville and Green may be said to have founded the method in 1837, and it is also commonly referred to as the Liouville–Green or LG method.^{[3]}^{[4]}

The important contribution of Jeffreys, Wentzel, Kramers, and Brillouin to the method was the inclusion of the treatment of turning points, connecting the evanescent and oscillatory solutions at either side of the turning point. For example, this may occur in the Schrödinger equation, due to a potential energy hill.

Generally, WKB theory is a method for approximating the solution of a differential equation whose *highest derivative is multiplied by a small parameter* ε. The method of approximation is as follows.

For a differential equation
assume a solution of the form of an asymptotic series expansion
in the limit *δ* → 0. The asymptotic scaling of δ in terms of ε will be determined by the equation – see the example below.

Substituting the above ansatz into the differential equation and cancelling out the exponential terms allows one to solve for an arbitrary number of terms *S*_{n}(*x*) in the expansion.

WKB theory is a special case of multiple scale analysis.^{[5]}^{[6]}^{[7]}

This example comes from the text of Carl M. Bender and Steven Orszag.^{[7]} Consider the second-order homogeneous linear differential equation
where . Substituting
results in the equation

To leading order in *ϵ* (assuming, for the moment, the series will be asymptotically consistent), the above can be approximated as

In the limit *δ* → 0, the dominant balance is given by

So δ is proportional to *ϵ*. Setting them equal and comparing powers yields
which can be recognized as the eikonal equation, with solution

Considering first-order powers of ϵ fixes
This has the solution
where *k*_{1} is an arbitrary constant.

We now have a pair of approximations to the system (a pair, because *S*_{0} can take two signs); the first-order WKB-approximation will be a linear combination of the two:

Higher-order terms can be obtained by looking at equations for higher powers of δ. Explicitly,
for *n* ≥ 2.

The asymptotic series for *y*(*x*) is usually a divergent series, whose general term *δ*^{n} *S*_{n}(*x*) starts to increase after a certain value *n* = *n*_{max}. Therefore, the smallest error achieved by the WKB method is at best of the order of the last included term.

For the equation
with *Q*(*x*) <0 an analytic function, the value and the magnitude of the last term can be estimated as follows:^{[8]}
where is the point at which needs to be evaluated and is the (complex) turning point where , closest to .

The number *n*_{max} can be interpreted as the number of oscillations between and the closest turning point.

If is a slowly changing function,
the number *n*_{max} will be large, and the minimum error of the asymptotic series will be exponentially small.

The above example may be applied specifically to the one-dimensional, time-independent Schrödinger equation, which can be rewritten as

The wavefunction can be rewritten as the exponential of another function S (closely related to the action), which could be complex, so that its substitution in Schrödinger's equation gives:

Next, the semiclassical approximation is used. This means that each function is expanded as a power series in ħ. Substituting in the equation, and only retaining terms up to first order in ℏ, we get: which gives the following two relations: which can be solved for 1D systems, first equation resulting in: and the second equation computed for the possible values of the above, is generally expressed as:

Thus, the resulting wavefunction in first order WKB approximation is presented as,^{[9]}^{[10]}

In the classically allowed region, namely the region where the integrand in the exponent is imaginary and the approximate wave function is oscillatory. In the classically forbidden region , the solutions are growing or decaying. It is evident in the denominator that both of these approximate solutions become singular near the classical **turning points**, where *E* = *V*(*x*), and cannot be valid. (The turning points are the points where the classical particle changes direction.)

Hence, when , the wavefunction can be chosen to be expressed as: and for , The integration in this solution is computed between the classical turning point and the arbitrary position x'.

From the condition:

It follows that:

For which the following two inequalities are equivalent since the terms in either side are equivalent, as used in the WKB approximation:

The first inequality can be used to show the following:

where is used and is the local de Broglie wavelength of the wavefunction. The inequality implies that the variation of potential is assumed to be slowly varying.^{[10]}^{[11]} This condition can also be restated as the fractional change of or that of the momentum , over the wavelength , being much smaller than .^{[12]}

Similarly it can be shown that also has restrictions based on underlying assumptions for the WKB approximation that: which implies that the de Broglie wavelength of the particle is slowly varying.^{[11]}

We now consider the behavior of the wave function near the turning points. For this, we need a different method. Near the first turning points, *x*_{1}, the term can be expanded in a power series,

To first order, one finds
This differential equation is known as the Airy equation, and the solution may be written in terms of Airy functions,^{[13]}

Although for any fixed value of , the wave function is bounded near the turning points, the wave function will be peaked there, as can be seen in the images above. As gets smaller, the height of the wave function at the turning points grows. It also follows from this approximation that:

It now remains to construct a global (approximate) solution to the Schrödinger equation. For the wave function to be square-integrable, we must take only the exponentially decaying solution in the two classically forbidden regions. These must then "connect" properly through the turning points to the classically allowed region. For most values of *E*, this matching procedure will not work: The function obtained by connecting the solution near to the classically allowed region will not agree with the function obtained by connecting the solution near to the classically allowed region. The requirement that the two functions agree imposes a condition on the energy *E*, which will give an approximation to the exact quantum energy levels.

The wavefunction's coefficients can be calculated for a simple problem shown in the figure. Let the first turning point, where the potential is decreasing over x, occur at and the second turning point, where potential is increasing over x, occur at . Given that we expect wavefunctions to be of the following form, we can calculate their coefficients by connecting the different regions using Airy and Bairy functions.

For ie. decreasing potential condition or in the given example shown by the figure, we require the exponential function to decay for negative values of x so that wavefunction for it to go to zero. Considering Bairy functions to be the required connection formula, we get:^{[14]}

We cannot use Airy function since it gives growing exponential behaviour for negative x. When compared to WKB solutions and matching their behaviours at , we conclude:

, and .

Thus, letting some normalization constant be , the wavefunction is given for increasing potential (with x) as:^{[10]}

For ie. increasing potential condition or in the given example shown by the figure, we require the exponential function to decay for positive values of x so that wavefunction for it to go to zero. Considering Airy functions to be the required connection formula, we get:^{[14]}

We cannot use Bairy function since it gives growing exponential behaviour for positive x. When compared to WKB solutions and matching their behaviours at , we conclude:

, and .

Thus, letting some normalization constant be , the wavefunction is given for increasing potential (with x) as:^{[10]}

Matching the two solutions for region , it is required that the difference between the angles in these functions is where the phase difference accounts for changing cosine to sine for the wavefunction and difference since negation of the function can occur by letting . Thus:
Where *n* is a non-negative integer. This condition can also be rewritten as saying that:

- The area enclosed by the classical energy curve is .

Either way, the condition on the energy is a version of the Bohr–Sommerfeld quantization condition, with a "Maslov correction" equal to 1/2.^{[15]}

It is possible to show that after piecing together the approximations in the various regions, one obtains a good approximation to the actual eigenfunction. In particular, the Maslov-corrected Bohr–Sommerfeld energies are good approximations to the actual eigenvalues of the Schrödinger operator.^{[16]} Specifically, the error in the energies is small compared to the typical spacing of the quantum energy levels. Thus, although the "old quantum theory" of Bohr and Sommerfeld was ultimately replaced by the Schrödinger equation, some vestige of that theory remains, as an approximation to the eigenvalues of the appropriate Schrödinger operator.

Thus, from the two cases the connection formula is obtained at a classical turning point, :^{[11]}

and:

The WKB wavefunction at the classical turning point away from it is approximated by oscillatory sine or cosine function in the classically allowed region, represented in the left and growing or decaying exponentials in the forbidden region, represented in the right. The implication follows due to the dominance of growing exponential compared to decaying exponential. Thus, the solutions of oscillating or exponential part of wavefunctions can imply the form of wavefunction on the other region of potential as well as at the associated turning point.

One can then compute the probability density associated to the approximate wave function. The probability that the quantum particle will be found in the classically forbidden region is small. In the classically allowed region, meanwhile, the probability the quantum particle will be found in a given interval is approximately the *fraction of time the classical particle spends in that interval* over one period of motion.^{[17]} Since the classical particle's velocity goes to zero at the turning points, it spends more time near the turning points than in other classically allowed regions. This observation accounts for the peak in the wave function (and its probability density) near the turning points.

Applications of the WKB method to Schrödinger equations with a large variety of potentials and comparison with perturbation methods and path integrals are treated in Müller-Kirsten.^{[18]}

Although WKB potential only applies to smoothly varying potentials,^{[11]} in the examples where rigid walls produce infinities for potential, the WKB approximation can still be used to approximate wavefunctions in regions of smoothly varying potentials. Since the rigid walls have highly discontinuous potential, the connection condition cannot be used at these points and the results obtained can also differ from that of the above treatment.^{[10]}

The potential of such systems can be given in the form:

where .

Finding wavefunction in bound region, ie. within classical turning points and , by considering approximations far from and respectively we have two solutions:

Since wavefunction must vanish near , we conclude . For airy functions near , we require . We require that angles within these functions have a phase difference where the phase difference accounts for changing sine to cosine and allowing .

Where *n* is a non-negative integer.^{[10]} Note that the right hand side of this would instead be if n was only allowed to non-zero natural numbers.

Thus we conclude that, for In 3 dimensions with spherically symmetry, the same condition holds where the position x is replaced by radial distance r, due to its similarity with this problem.^{[19]}

The potential of such systems can be given in the form:

where .

For between and which are thus the classical turning points, by considering approximations far from and respectively we have two solutions:

Since wavefunctions must vanish at and . Here, the phase difference only needs to account for which allows . Hence the condition becomes:

where but not equal to zero since it makes the wavefunction zero everywhere.^{[10]}

Consider the following potential a bouncing ball is subjected to:

The wavefunction solutions of the above can be solved using the WKB method by considering only odd parity solutions of the alternative potential . The classical turning points are identified and . Thus applying the quantization condition obtained in WKB:

Letting where , solving for with given , we get the quantum mechanical energy of a bouncing ball:^{[20]}

This result is also consistent with the use of equation from bound state of one rigid wall without needing to consider an alternative potential.

The potential of such systems can be given in the form:

where .

It's solutions for an incident wave is given:

Where the wavefunction in the classically forbidden region is the WKB approximation but neglecting the growing exponential, which is a fair assumption for wide potential barriers through which the wavefunction is not expected to grow to high magnitudes.

By the requirement of continuity of wavefunction and its derivatives, the following relation can be shown:

where and .

Using we express the values without signs as:

Thus, the transmission coefficient is found to be:

where , and . The result can be stated as where .^{[10]}

- Airy function
- Einstein–Brillouin–Keller method
- Field electron emission
- Instanton
- Langer correction
- Maslov index
- Method of dominant balance
- Method of matched asymptotic expansions
- Method of steepest descent
- Old quantum theory
- Perturbation methods
- Quantum tunneling
- Slowly varying envelope approximation
- Supersymmetric WKB approximation

**^**Hall 2013 Section 15.1**^**Dingle, Robert Balson (1973).*Asymptotic Expansions: Their Derivation and Interpretation*. Academic Press. ISBN 0-12-216550-0.**^**Adrian E. Gill (1982).*Atmosphere-ocean dynamics*. Academic Press. p. 297. ISBN 978-0-12-283522-3.Liouville-Green WKBJ WKB.

**^**Renato Spigler & Marco Vianello (1998). "A Survey on the Liouville–Green (WKB) approximation for linear difference equations of the second order". In Saber Elaydi; I. Győri & G. E. Ladas (eds.).*Advances in difference equations: proceedings of the Second International Conference on Difference Equations : Veszprém, Hungary, August 7–11, 1995*. CRC Press. p. 567. ISBN 978-90-5699-521-8.**^**Filippi, Paul (1999).*Acoustics: basic physics, theory and methods*. Academic Press. p. 171. ISBN 978-0-12-256190-0.**^**Kevorkian, J.; Cole, J. D. (1996).*Multiple scale and singular perturbation methods*. Springer. ISBN 0-387-94202-5.- ^
^{a}^{b}Bender, Carl M.; Orszag, Steven A. (1999).*Advanced mathematical methods for scientists and engineers*. Springer. pp. 549–568. ISBN 0-387-98931-5. **^**Winitzki, S. (2005). "Cosmological particle production and the precision of the WKB approximation".*Phys. Rev. D*.**72**(10): 104011, 14 pp. arXiv:gr-qc/0510001. Bibcode:2005PhRvD..72j4011W. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72.104011. S2CID 119152049.**^**Hall 2013 Section 15.4- ^
^{a}^{b}^{c}^{d}^{e}^{f}^{g}^{h}Zettili, Nouredine (2009).*Quantum mechanics: concepts and applications*(2nd ed.). Chichester: Wiley. ISBN 978-0-470-02679-3. - ^
^{a}^{b}^{c}^{d}Zwiebach, Barton. "Semiclassical approximation" (PDF). **^**Bransden, B. H.; Joachain, Charles Jean (2003).*Physics of Atoms and Molecules*. Prentice Hall. pp. 140–141. ISBN 978-0-582-35692-4.**^**Hall 2013 Section 15.5- ^
^{a}^{b}Ramkarthik, M. S.; Pereira, Elizabeth Louis (2021-06-01). "Airy Functions Demystified — II".*Resonance*.**26**(6): 757–789. doi:10.1007/s12045-021-1179-z. ISSN 0973-712X. **^**Hall 2013 Section 15.2**^**Hall 2013 Theorem 15.8**^**Hall 2013 Conclusion 15.5**^**Harald J.W. Müller-Kirsten, Introduction to Quantum Mechanics: Schrödinger Equation and Path Integral, 2nd ed. (World Scientific, 2012).**^**Weinberg, Steven (2015-09-10).*Lectures on Quantum Mechanics*(2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 204. doi:10.1017/cbo9781316276105. ISBN 978-1-107-11166-0.**^**Sakurai, Jun John; Napolitano, Jim (2021).*Modern quantum mechanics*(3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-108-47322-4.

- Bender, Carl; Orszag, Steven (1978).
*Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers*. McGraw-Hill. ISBN 0-07-004452-X. - Child, M. S. (1991).
*Semiclassical mechanics with molecular applications*. Oxford: Clarendon Press. ISBN 0-19-855654-3. - Fröman, N.; Fröman, P.-O. (1965).
*JWKB Approximation: Contributions to the Theory*. Amsterdam: North-Holland. - Griffiths, David J. (2004).
*Introduction to Quantum Mechanics*(2nd ed.). Prentice Hall. ISBN 0-13-111892-7. - Hall, Brian C. (2013),
*Quantum Theory for Mathematicians*, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 267, Springer, ISBN 978-1461471158 - Liboff, Richard L. (2003).
*Introductory Quantum Mechanics*(4th ed.). Addison-Wesley. ISBN 0-8053-8714-5. - Olver, Frank William John (1974).
*Asymptotics and Special Functions*. Academic Press. ISBN 0-12-525850-X. - Razavy, Mohsen (2003).
*Quantum Theory of Tunneling*. World Scientific. ISBN 981-238-019-1. - Sakurai, J. J. (1993).
*Modern Quantum Mechanics*. Addison-Wesley. ISBN 0-201-53929-2.

- Carlini, Francesco (1817).
*Ricerche sulla convergenza della serie che serva alla soluzione del problema di Keplero*. Milano. - Liouville, Joseph (1837). "Sur le développement des fonctions et séries.".
*Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées*.**1**: 16–35. - Green, George (1837). "On the motion of waves in a variable canal of small depth and width".
*Transactions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society*.**6**: 457–462. - Rayleigh, Lord (John William Strutt) (1912). "On the propagation of waves through a stratified medium, with special reference to the question of reflection".
*Proceedings of the Royal Society A*.**86**(586): 207–226. Bibcode:1912RSPSA..86..207R. doi:10.1098/rspa.1912.0014. - Gans, Richard (1915). "Fortplantzung des Lichts durch ein inhomogenes Medium".
*Annalen der Physik*.**47**(14): 709–736. Bibcode:1915AnP...352..709G. doi:10.1002/andp.19153521402. - Jeffreys, Harold (1924). "On certain approximate solutions of linear differential equations of the second order".
*Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society*.**23**: 428–436. doi:10.1112/plms/s2-23.1.428. - Brillouin, Léon (1926). "La mécanique ondulatoire de Schrödinger: une méthode générale de resolution par approximations successives".
*Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences*.**183**: 24–26. - Kramers, Hendrik A. (1926). "Wellenmechanik und halbzahlige Quantisierung".
*Zeitschrift für Physik*.**39**(10–11): 828–840. Bibcode:1926ZPhy...39..828K. doi:10.1007/BF01451751. S2CID 122955156. - Wentzel, Gregor (1926). "Eine Verallgemeinerung der Quantenbedingungen für die Zwecke der Wellenmechanik".
*Zeitschrift für Physik*.**38**(6–7): 518–529. Bibcode:1926ZPhy...38..518W. doi:10.1007/BF01397171. S2CID 120096571.

- Fitzpatrick, Richard (2002). "The W.K.B. Approximation". (An application of the WKB approximation to the scattering of radio waves from the ionosphere.)