Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis research

Summary

Research on amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) has focused on animal models of the disease, its mechanisms, ways to diagnose and track it, and treatments.[1]

Disease models edit

Many models have been used by researchers in labs to study the disease pathways, mechanisms, and symptoms on simple organisms.[2] [1]

In vitro edit

In this strategy the disease is introduced to cell cultures in petri dishes.[2] In this case, motor cells can be grown, and the gene expression is controlled. CRISPR/Cas9 technique can be used to knock-out/in genes that are related to ALS, and it is very beneficial in increasing the expression of the genes to mimic the human model of ALS for a faster onset of the disease.[2] This type of model can be beneficial in high-throughput screening for drug candidates for ALS.[2]

Familial ALS is the most studied; however, a new technique that was recently introduced is the use of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC).[2] In this study the researcher can isolate skin fibroblast from a patient with familial or sporadic ALS and reprogram them into motor neuron to study ALS.[2] The main advantage of iPSC is that it allowed researchers to study and understand sALS, and it shows a remarkable contribution in cell-based therapy and drug screening.[2] A recent example had used iPSC of patient with SOD1 dominant mutation and they studied the motor neurons derived from the patient, and they found that the functional genes and the ER stress regulating genes of the mitochondria were reduced in SOD1 patients, similar to the effect of C9orf72 mutation on the patients.[3] In addition, some studies showed that iPSC is better than other types of stem cells due to its ability in differentiating into a mature neuron cell, and many other cells too. These iPSC derived cells can be used in transplant cell therapy, in which they can introduce the differentiated cells into the ALS patient to reduce the symptoms without harming the patient.[3]

In vivo edit

Many animals have been used over the years to study ALS and to search for a potential therapy.[1] The animal models can be C. elegans which has only 959 cells with simple structure, and known gene code.[4] Also, some studied have introduced the transgenic strain of C. elegans, which has a mutation in a gene related to ALS for example, and crossed them with the transgenic nlp-29 GFP reporter strain, resulting in fluorescent markers to the cells that are expressing these mutated genes, which can be used to monitor the disease development and effects.[5] Similar, but more complex nervous system from the C. elegans is the Drosophila. Fruit fly ALS models can be used to study the locomotion and eye changes that can be related to human symptoms.[6] Thus, drugs can be tested on these transgenic fruit flies to discovery new target molecules.[4] [6] On the other hand, zebrafish models have been used widely due to their similarity in the development and anatomy characteristics as a vertebrate to the human body.[4] A study introduced the SOD1/GFP transgenic zebra-fish to study that specific gene on the development and occurrence of ALS in the fish, and how can that be used in testing potential therapeutic molecules.[7] All the previous models are considered simple, and save time and money due to their short lifespan and small and simple body structure.[4]

The most studied model for ALS is the rodent, mouse model, which provide the most complex representation of nervous system that is considered the closest in mimicking human nervous system.[4] In this model, the phenotype, and genotype characteristics can be studied and controlled. Many researchers have used transgenic mouse models to study ALS, and one example is the expressing of C9orf72 mutation that can be introduced in mouse using the BAC C9orf72 gene with the multiple repeats of GGGGCC.[8] In that study they chose the bacterial artificial chromosome that has the human length of C9orf72 gene, and they introduced multiple repeats for faster onset of ALS.[8] Also, they have selected for the most stable clone using different conditions, and concluded that the 40 and 500 repeats in the low temperature condition was the most efficient in retaining expansion mutations.[8] Using different BAC C9orf72 transgenic mouse model, they were able to study the symptoms of ALS, such as gait abnormalities, anxiety-like behavior, reduced grip strength, and even death rates.[8] Also, the denervation of motor neurons and dysfunction of neurons can be visualized using fluorescent markers to study the neurodegenerative disorder progression in ALS.[8] Another study also used the SOD1 mutation transgenic mice where they have showed similar signs of ALS that included the axonal and mitochondrial dysfunction and denervation of motor neurons and the reduction of the overall number of neurons in the limbs of the mouse.[9] The TDP-43 transgenic mouse model was also used for ALS studies and it shows similar results to the SOD1 expression, which includes the axon denervation phenotype.[9] For this model which depends on the promoters, they have made many other transgenic mouse models that uses different promoter to compare their phenotype and progression of TDP-43 ALS.[9] Rat models, on the other hand is not very widely used, but their large size can be beneficial in intrathecal injection or mini pump insertion is needed in pharmacological trials. In fact, studied showed that using SOD1 transgenic rat models showed similar development of the genetic and phenotypic traits of the ALS disease.[9]

In silico edit

Since the early 2000s, computational approaches involving the application of computational statistics and machine learning techniques to data of patients diagnosed with ALS have been employed by researchers worldwide. For example, crowd-sourcing DREAM challenge about computational approaches for ALS electronic health records' data has been carried out in 2017.[10]

Potential treatments edit

Past clinical trials edit

From the 1960s until 2014, about 50 drugs for ALS were tested in randomized controlled trials (RCTs); of these, riluzole was the only one that showed a slight benefit in improving survival[citation needed]. Drugs not shown to be effective in clinical trials in humans include antiviral drugs (transfer factor, tilorone, indinavir,[11] and amantadine);[12] anti-excitotoxic drugs (branched-chain amino acids, threonine, lamotrigine, gabapentin, nimodipine, dextromethorphan, topiramate, memantine, talampanel, and ceftriaxone), growth factors (acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, octacosanol, gangliosides, thyrotropin-releasing hormone, growth hormone, and erythropoietin); neurotrophic factors (ciliary neurotrophic factor, insulin-like growth factor 1, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor, xaliproden, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor), anti-inflammatory drugs (plasma exchange, cyclosporine,[11] cyclophosphamide,[12] total lymphoid irradiation, glatiramer acetate, celecoxib, minocycline, and NP001); antioxidants (acetylcysteine, glutathione, selegiline, vitamin E, and coenzyme Q); anti-apoptotic drugs (pentoxyfilline, omigapil, and minocycline); and drugs to improve mitochondria function (creatine, acetyl-L-carnitine, dexpramipexole, and olesoxime). Other drugs with a variety of mechanisms were tested in clinical trials and not shown to be effective, including phenylbutyrate, valproic acid, lithium carbonate, pioglitazone, Ono-2506 (arundic acid), and arimoclomol.[11]

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation had been studied in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in small and poorly designed clinical trials; as of 2013, there was insufficient evidence to know whether rTMS is safe or effective for ALS.[13]

One 2016 review of stem cell therapy trials found tentative evidence that intraspinal stem cell implantation was relatively safe and possibly effective.[14] A 2019 Cochrane review of cell based therapies found that there was insufficient evidence to speculate about efficacy.[15] Stem cell therapy can provide additional proteins and enzymes that have shown to help prolong survival and control the symptoms associated with ALS.[16][17] Those proteins include neurotrophic factors and insulin-like growth factor 1. Both those proteins are still under clinical trials and need to be further studied to evaluate their efficiency and associated side effects.[16][17]

Masitinib has been approved as an orphan medication in Europe and the United States with studies ongoing as of 2016.[18] Medications tested but without evidence for efficacy include lamotrigine, dextromethorphan, gabapentin, BCAAs, Vitamin E, acetylcysteine, selegiline, amantadine, cyclophosphamide, various neurotrophic factors, which has shown promise in both in-vitro and in-vivo models of ALS but is yet to be effective in human models of ALS[12][16][17] and creatine.[19] Beta-adrenergic agonist drugs have been proposed as a treatment for their effects on muscle growth and neuroprotection, but there is insufficient research in humans to determine their efficacy.[20]

Techniques to deliver drugs and medications in a better manner are also being investigated and those include altering and developing drugs with specific characteristics, such as size and charge, to allow for their passage through the blood-brain barrier.[17][21] Furthermore, specific antisense oligonucleotides are being developed that may slow down the progression of ALS and reduce toxicity.[21] Antisense oligonucleotides target specific sequences associated with the C9ORF72 gene that has been identified as a cause for ALS.[21] Another delivery technique being investigated is through adeno-associated viruses that have the ability to deliver drugs and other proteins and genetic components to the central nervous system and aid in protecting neurons from damage caused by ALS.[17][21]

References edit

  1. ^ a b c Liguori, Francesco; Amadio, Susanna; Volonté, Cinzia (12 April 2021). "Where and Why Modeling Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis". International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 22 (8): 3977. doi:10.3390/ijms22083977. PMC 8070525. PMID 33921446.
  2. ^ a b c d e f g Damme, Philip Van; Robberecht, Wim; Bosch, Ludo Van Den (2017-05-01). "Modelling amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: progress and possibilities". Disease Models & Mechanisms. 10 (5): 537–549. doi:10.1242/dmm.029058. ISSN 1754-8403. PMC 5451175. PMID 28468939.
  3. ^ a b Kim, Changsung; Lee, Hee Chul; Sung, Jung-Joon (2014-09-01). "Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis - Cell Based Therapy and Novel Therapeutic Development". Experimental Neurobiology. 23 (3): 207–14. doi:10.5607/en.2014.23.3.207. ISSN 1226-2560. PMC 4174611. PMID 25258567.
  4. ^ a b c d e "Scientific Focus Areas - Disease Models". ALSA.org. Retrieved 2017-11-01.
  5. ^ Vérièpe, Julie; Fossouo, Lucresse; Parker, J. Alex (2015-06-10). "Neurodegeneration in C. elegans models of ALS requires TIR-1/Sarm1 immune pathway activation in neurons". Nature Communications. 6: ncomms8319. arXiv:1502.07513. doi:10.1038/ncomms8319. PMID 26059317.
  6. ^ a b Liguori, Francesco; Amadio, Susanna; Volonté, Cinzia (28 July 2021). "Fly for ALS: Drosophila modeling on the route to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis modifiers". Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 78 (17–18): 6143–6160. doi:10.1007/s00018-021-03905-8. PMID 34322715.
  7. ^ Sakowski, Stacey A.; Lunn, J. Simon; Busta, Angela S.; Oh, Sang Su; Zamora-Berridi, Grettel; Palmer, Madeline; Rosenberg, Andrew A.; Philip, Stephen G.; Dowling, James J. (2012-08-31). "Neuromuscular effects of G93A-SOD1 expression in zebrafish". Molecular Neurodegeneration. 7: 44. doi:10.1186/1750-1326-7-44. ISSN 1750-1326. PMC 3506515. PMID 22938571.
  8. ^ a b c d e Liu, Yuanjing; Pattamatta, Amrutha; Zu, Tao; Reid, Tammy; Bardhi, Olgert; Borchelt, David R.; Yachnis, Anthony T.; Ranum, Laura P.W. (2016). "C9orf72 BAC Mouse Model with Motor Deficits and Neurodegenerative Features of ALS/FTD". Neuron. 90 (3): 521–534. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.04.005. PMID 27112499.
  9. ^ a b c d McGoldrick, Philip; Joyce, Peter I.; Fisher, Elizabeth M.C.; Greensmith, Linda (2013). "Rodent models of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis". Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease. 1832 (9): 1421–1436. doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2013.03.012. PMID 23524377.
  10. ^ Robert, Kueffner; et, al. (2019). "Stratification of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients: a crowdsourcing approach". Scientific Reports. 5562 (9): 690. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-36873-4. PMC 6345935. PMID 30679616.
  11. ^ a b c Mitsumoto H, Brooks BR, Silani V (November 2014). "Clinical trials in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: why so many negative trials and how can trials be improved?". The Lancet. Neurology. 13 (11): 1127–1138. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70129-2. PMC 8834450. PMID 25316019.
  12. ^ a b c Rowland LP, Shneider NA (May 2001). "Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis". The New England Journal of Medicine. 344 (22): 1688–700. doi:10.1056/NEJM200105313442207. PMID 11386269.
  13. ^ Fang, J; Zhou, M; Yang, M; Zhu, C; He, L (31 May 2013). "Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or motor neuron disease". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2013 (5): CD008554. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008554.pub3. PMC 7173713. PMID 23728676.
  14. ^ Chen, Kevin S.; Sakowski, Stacey A.; Feldman, Eva L. (March 2016). "Intraspinal stem cell transplantation for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis". Annals of Neurology. 79 (3): 342–353. doi:10.1002/ana.24584. PMC 4789073. PMID 26696091.
  15. ^ Abdul Wahid, S. Fadilah; Law, Zhe Kang; Ismail, Nor Azimah; Lai, Nai Ming (19 December 2019). "Cell-based therapies for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2019 (12): CD011742. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD011742.pub3. ISSN 1469-493X. PMC 6920743. PMID 31853962.
  16. ^ a b c Orrell, Richard (2010). "Motor neuron disease: systematic reviews of treatment for ALS and SMA". British Medical Bulletin. 93: 145–159. doi:10.1093/bmb/ldp049. PMID 20015852.
  17. ^ a b c d e Ekestern, Eva (2004). "Neurotrophic Factors and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis". Neurodegenerative Dis. 1 (2–3): 88–100. doi:10.1159/000080049. PMID 16908980.
  18. ^ "Public summary of opinion on orphan designation Masitinib mesilate for treatment of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis" (PDF). EMA. European Medicines Agency, Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products. 22 September 2016. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 November 2016. Retrieved 6 November 2016.
  19. ^ Pastula, Daniel M.; Moore, Dan H.; Bedlack, Richard S. (12 December 2012). "Creatine for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis/motor neuron disease". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 12: CD005225. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005225.pub3. ISSN 1469-493X. PMID 23235621.
  20. ^ Bartus, Raymond T.; Bétourné, Alexandre; Basile, Anthony; Peterson, Bethany L.; Glass, Jonathan; Boulis, Nicholas M. (1 January 2016). "β2-Adrenoceptor agonists as novel, safe and potentially effective therapies for Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)". Neurobiology of Disease. 85: 11–24. doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2015.10.006. ISSN 1095-953X. PMID 26459114.
  21. ^ a b c d Brown, Robert; Al-Chalabi, Ammar (2017). "Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis". N Engl J Med. 377 (2): 162–172. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1603471. PMID 28700839.

Further reading edit

  • Robert, Kueffner; et, al. (2019). "Stratification of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients: a crowdsourcing approach". Scientific Reports. 5562 (9): 690. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-36873-4. PMC 6345935. PMID 30679616.