ICC Women's ODI and T20I Team Rankings

Summary

The ICC women's rankings were launched on 1 October 2015 covering all three formats of women's cricket. The ranking system gives equal weight to results of Test, ODI, and T20 matches. It was designed by statistician and ICC Cricket Committee member David Kendix and utilizes the same methodology as men's cricket rankings.[1] Each team scores points based on the results of their matches over the last 3–4 years − all matches played in the 12–24 months since the first of October before last, plus all the matches played in the 24 months before that, for which the matches played and points earned both count half.[2][1]

Australia women's national cricket team is currently the number 1 team in ODIs and T20Is

On 1 October of every year, the matches and points earned between 3 and 4 years ago are removed, and the matches and points earned between 1 and 2 years ago switch from 100% weighting to 50% weighting. For example, on 1 October 2014, the matches played between October 2010 and September 2011 were removed, and the matches played between October 2012 and September 2013 switched to 50% weighting.[1]

In October 2018 following the ICC's decision to award T20 International status to all members, the Women's rankings were split into separate ODI (for Full Members) and T20I lists.[3]

ODI rankings edit

ICC Women's ODI Rankings .mw-parser-output .hlist dl,.mw-parser-output .hlist ol,.mw-parser-output .hlist ul{margin:0;padding:0}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt,.mw-parser-output .hlist li{margin:0;display:inline}.mw-parser-output .hlist.inline,.mw-parser-output .hlist.inline dl,.mw-parser-output .hlist.inline ol,.mw-parser-output .hlist.inline ul,.mw-parser-output .hlist dl dl,.mw-parser-output .hlist dl ol,.mw-parser-output .hlist dl ul,.mw-parser-output .hlist ol dl,.mw-parser-output .hlist ol ol,.mw-parser-output .hlist ol ul,.mw-parser-output .hlist ul dl,.mw-parser-output .hlist ul ol,.mw-parser-output .hlist ul ul{display:inline}.mw-parser-output .hlist .mw-empty-li{display:none}.mw-parser-output .hlist dt::after{content:": "}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist li::after{content:" · ";font-weight:bold}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist li:last-child::after{content:none}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd dd:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dd dt:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dd li:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt dd:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt dt:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt li:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist li dd:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist li dt:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist li li:first-child::before{content:" (";font-weight:normal}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd dd:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dd dt:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dd li:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt dd:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt dt:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt li:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist li dd:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist li dt:last-child::after,.mw-parser-output .hlist li li:last-child::after{content:")";font-weight:normal}.mw-parser-output .hlist ol{counter-reset:listitem}.mw-parser-output .hlist ol>li{counter-increment:listitem}.mw-parser-output .hlist ol>li::before{content:" "counter(listitem)"\a0 "}.mw-parser-output .hlist dd ol>li:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist dt ol>li:first-child::before,.mw-parser-output .hlist li ol>li:first-child::before{content:" ("counter(listitem)"\a0 "}.mw-parser-output .navbar{display:inline;font-size:88%;font-weight:normal}.mw-parser-output .navbar-collapse{float:left;text-align:left}.mw-parser-output .navbar-boxtext{word-spacing:0}.mw-parser-output .navbar ul{display:inline-block;white-space:nowrap;line-height:inherit}.mw-parser-output .navbar-brackets::before{margin-right:-0.125em;content:"[ "}.mw-parser-output .navbar-brackets::after{margin-left:-0.125em;content:" ]"}.mw-parser-output .navbar li{word-spacing:-0.125em}.mw-parser-output .navbar a>span,.mw-parser-output .navbar a>abbr{text-decoration:inherit}.mw-parser-output .navbar-mini abbr{font-variant:small-caps;border-bottom:none;text-decoration:none;cursor:inherit}.mw-parser-output .navbar-ct-full{font-size:114%;margin:0 7em}.mw-parser-output .navbar-ct-mini{font-size:114%;margin:0 4em}v
  • t
  • e
  • Rank Team Matches Points Rating
    1  Australia 30 4,889 163
    2  England 26 3,322 128
    3  South Africa 29 3,309 114
    4  New Zealand 27 2,604 96
    5  India 21 2,004 95
    6  West Indies 23 2,119 92
    7  Sri Lanka 11 948 86
    8  Bangladesh 20 1,574 79
    9  Thailand 11 753 68
    10  Pakistan 30 1,962 65
    11  Ireland 19 675 36
    12  Zimbabwe 13 172 13
    13  Netherlands 9 94 10
    Reference: ICC Women's ODI rankings, Updated on 23 April 2024

    T20I rankings edit

    ICC Women's T20I Rankings
    Rank Team Matches Points Rating
    1  Australia 34 9,982 294
    2  England 36 10,167 282
    3  India 48 12,613 263
    4  New Zealand 32 8,163 255
    5  South Africa 32 7,736 242
    6  West Indies 32 7,588 237
    7  Sri Lanka 40 9,209 230
    8  Pakistan 39 8,520 218
    9  Bangladesh 38 7,562 199
    10  Ireland 38 6,868 181
    11  Papua New Guinea 26 4,088 157
    12  Thailand 44 6,766 154
    13  Zimbabwe 37 5,616 152
    14  Scotland 28 4,236 151
    15  Netherlands 29 3,595 124
    16  United Arab Emirates 52 6,531 122
    17  Namibia 33 3,649 111
    18  Uganda 52 5,690 109
    19  Tanzania 34 3,468 102
    20  Indonesia 26 2,609 100
    21    Nepal 32 3,101 97
    22  Hong Kong 41 3,691 90
    23  United States 17 1,320 78
    24  Malaysia 43 3,225 75
    25  Kenya 39 2,903 74
    26  Nigeria 38 2,676 70
    27  Rwanda 49 3,428 70
    28  Italy 20 1,319 66
    29  Jersey 13 839 65
    30  Vanuatu 27 1,628 60
    31  Canada 9 513 57
    32  Greece 11 613 56
    33  Germany 15 766 51
    34  Spain 6 256 43
    35  France 23 973 42
    36  Brazil 20 846 42
    37  Sweden 16 586 37
    38  Guernsey 11 375 34
    39  Isle of Man 14 462 33
    40  Sierra Leone 21 632 30
    41  Botswana 32 930 29
    42  Myanmar 13 334 26
    43  Bhutan 12 302 25
    44  China 12 294 25
    45  Kuwait 21 487 23
    46  Samoa 21 386 18
    47  Singapore 27 485 18
    48  Mozambique 16 269 17
    49  Malta 6 100 17
    50  Romania 13 207 16
    51  Japan 24 363 15
    52  Bahrain 11 123 11
    53  Cook Islands 11 108 10
    54  Cameroon 12 111 9
    55  Argentina 20 150 8
    56  Denmark 8 57 7
    57  Qatar 20 126 6
    58  Austria 24 102 4
    59  Cambodia 13 28 2
    60  Oman 7 11 2
    61  Norway 11 3 0
    62  Mongolia 8 0 0
    63  Eswatini 9 0 0
    64  Serbia 7 0 0
    65  Philippines 12 0 0
    66  Lesotho 10 0 0
    67  Ghana 7 0 0
    68  Fiji 21 0 0
    References: ICC Women's T20I Rankings, Updated on 11 May 2024

    See also edit

    References edit

    1. ^ a b c "Live Cricket Scores & News International Cricket Council". Archived from the original on 2016-12-25. Retrieved 2017-07-26.
    2. ^ "FAQs on ICC ODI Team Rankings". Qn4,5, ICC. Retrieved 2016-02-17.
    3. ^ "ICC Launches Global Women's T20I Team Rankings". Retrieved 2018-10-12.