Roots
Analysis
To
order this 330+ page report, which features 130+ figures and 145+ tables,
please visit this - https://www.rootsanalysis.com/reports/view_document/protein-degradation-market/289.html
Key Market Insights
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
§
For
more information please visit:
https://www.rootsanalysis.com/reports/view_document/protein-degradation-market/289.html
Table of Contents
1. PREFACE
1.1. Scope
of the Report
1.2. Research
Methodology
1.3. Chapter
Outlines
2. EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
3.1. Context and Background
3.2. Concept of Protein
Homeostasis
3.3. Discovery of the Ubiquitin
Proteasome System
3.3.1. Ubiquitin: Structure and
Function
3.3.2. Fundamentals of the UPS
3.3.3. Components of the UPS
3.4. Key Steps Involved in the UPS
3.4.1. Ubiquitination: The First Step
3.4.2. Proteasomal Degradation: The
Second Step
3.5. Therapeutic Applications of
the UPS
3.6. Advantages and Challenges
Associated with Ubiquitin Enzyme Inhibitors
3.7. Targeted
Protein Degradation: Enhancing Ubiquitination to Degrade Undruggable Targets
3.7.1. Brief History of Targeted
Protein Degradation
3.8. Types of Protein Degraders
3.8.1. Selective Hormone Receptor
Degraders (SHRDs)
3.8.2. Immumodulatory Imide Drugs
(IMiDs)
3.8.3. PROTACs
3.8.4. Other Chimeras (ENDTACs, LYTACs
and PHOTACs)
3.8.4.1. Endosome
Targeting Chimeras (ENDTACs)
3.8.4.2. Lysozyme
targeting chimeras (LYTACs)
3.8.5. Specific
and Nongenetic Inhibitor-of-Apoptosis Proteins (IAP)-dependent Protein Erasers
(SNIPERS)
3.8.6. Hydrophobic Tag
3.8.7. Molecular Glues
3.8.8. DUB Inhibitors
3.9. Growth Drivers and Roadblocks
4. CURRENT MARKET LANDSCAPE
4.1. Chapter
Overview
4.2. Targeted
Protein Degradation-based Therapeutics and Technologies: Development Pipeline
4.2.1. Analysis
by Type of Protein Degrader
4.2.2. Analysis
by Phase of Development
4.2.3. Analysis
by Therapeutic Area
4.2.4. Analysis
by Target Indication
4.2.5. Analysis
by Type of Target Enzyme
4.2.6. Analysis
by Type of Target Protein
4.2.7. Analysis
by Type of Therapy
4.2.8. Analysis
by Route of Administration
4.3. Targeted
Protein Degradation-based Therapeutics and Technologies: List of Research Tools
/ Key Technology Platforms
4.4. Targeted
Protein Degradation-based Therapeutics and Technologies: Developer Landscape
4.4.1. Analysis
by Year of Establishment
4.4.2. Analysis
by Location of Headquarters
4.4.3. Analysis
by Size of Company
4.4.4. Analysis
by Type of Protein Degrader
5. COMPANY
PROFILES
5.1. Chapter
Overview
5.2. Developers
with Clinical Candidates
5.2.1. Radius
Health
5.2.1.1. Company
Overview
5.2.1.2. Targeted
Protein Degradation-based Drug Portfolio
5.2.1.2.1. Product Description: Elacestrant
5.2.1.3. Recent
Developments and Future Outlook
5.2.2. Celgene
5.2.2.1. Company
Overview
5.2.2.2. Financial
Information
5.2.2.3. Targeted
Protein Degradation-based Drug Portfolio
5.2.2.3.1. Avadomide (CC-122)
5.2.2.3.2. Iberdomide (CC-220)
5.2.2.4. Recent
Developments and Future Outlook
5.2.3. Sanofi
Genzyme
5.2.3.1. Company
Overview
5.2.3.2. Financial
Information
5.2.3.3. Targeted
Protein Degradation-based Drug Portfolio
5.2.3.3.1. Product Description: SAR439859
5.2.3.4. Recent
Developments and Future Outlook
5.3. Developers
with Preclinical / Early-stage Clinical Candidates
5.3.1. Arvinas
5.3.2. Captor
Therapeutics
5.3.3. Genentech
5.3.4. Kymera
Therapeutics
5.3.5. Mission
Therapeutics
5.3.6. Progenra
5.3.7. Zenopharm
6. CLINICAL
TRIAL ANALYSIS
6.1. Chapter
Overview
6.2. Scope
and Methodology
6.3. Targeted
Protein Degradation-based Therapeutics and Technologies: List of Clinical
Trials
6.3.1. Analysis
by Trial Registration Year
6.3.2. Geographical
Analysis by Number of Clinical Trials
6.3.3. Geographical
Analysis by Enrolled Patient Population
6.3.4. Analysis
by Type of Protein Degrader
6.3.5. Analysis
by Phase of Development
6.3.6. Analysis
by Study Design
6.3.7. Analysis
by Type of Sponsor / Collaborator
6.3.8. Most
Active Players: Analysis by Number of Registered Trials
6.3.9. Analysis
by Trial Focus
6.3.10. Analysis
by Therapeutic Area
6.3.11. Analysis
by Clinical Endpoints
7. KOL
ANALYSIS
7.1. Chapter Overview
7.2. Scope and Methodology
7.3. Targeted
Protein Degradation-based Therapeutics and Technologies: List of Principal
Investigators Involved in Clinical Trials
7.3.1. Analysis by Type of Organization
7.3.2. Analysis by Designation
7.3.3. Geographical Distribution
7.3.4. Analysis by Therapeutic Focus
7.3.5. Analysis by Phase of Development
and Type of Degrader
7.4. Prominent Key Opinion Leaders
7.5. KOL
Benchmarking: Roots Analysis versus Third Party Scoring (ResearchGate Score)
7.6. Most Active Key Opinion
Leaders
7.6.1. KOL Profile (Hagop Youssoufian)
7.6.2. KOL Profile (Patricia LoRusso)
7.6.3. KOL Profile (Johann De Bono)
7.6.4. KOL Profile (John N Nemunaitis)
7.6.5. KOL Profile (Robert Morgan)
7.6.6. KOL Profile (Edward O’Mara)
8. PUBLICATION ANALYSIS
8.1. Chapter Overview
8.2. Scope and Methodology
8.3. Targeted
Protein Degradation-Based Therapeutics and Technologies: Recent Publications
8.3.1. Analysis by Year of Publication
8.3.2. Analysis by Study Objective
8.3.3. Emerging Focus Areas
8.3.4. Analysis by Type of Protein
Degrader
8.3.5. Analysis by Target Protein
8.3.6. Analysis by Target Enzyme
8.3.7. Analysis by Target Indication
8.3.8. Analysis by Type of Publisher
8.3.9. Leading Players: Analysis by
Number of Publications
8.3.10. Leading Players: Geographical
Analysis by Number of Publications
8.3.11. Key Journals: Analysis by Number
of Publications
9. FUNDING
AND INVESTMENT ANALYSIS
9.1. Chapter
Overview
9.2. Types
of Funding
9.3. Targeted
Protein Degradation: Funding and Investment Analysis
9.3.1. Analysis
by Number of Funding Instances
9.3.2. Analysis
by Amount Invested
9.3.3. Analysis
by Type of Funding
9.3.4. Analysis
by Number of Funding Instances and Amount Invested across Different Protein
Degraders
9.3.5. Analysis
by Number of Funding Instances and Amount Invested across Different Therapeutic
Areas
9.3.6. Analysis
by Amount Invested across Different Protein Degradation Technology Platforms
9.3.7. Most
Active Players: Analysis by Number of Funding Instances
9.3.8. Most
Active Investors: Analysis by Number of Funding Instances
9.3.9. Geographical
Analysis by Amount Invested
9.4. Concluding
Remarks
10. PARTNERSHIPS
AND COLLABORATIONS
10.1. Chapter
Overview
10.2. Partnership
Models
10.3. Targeted
Protein Degradation-based Therapeutics and Technologies: Recent Collaborations
and Partnerships
10.3.1. Analysis
by Year of Partnership
10.3.2. Analysis
by Type of Partnership
10.3.3. Analysis
by Type of Protein Degrader
10.3.4. Analysis
by Therapeutic Area
10.3.5. Analysis
by Different Protein Degradation Technology
10.3.6. Most
Active Players: Analysis by Number of Partnerships
10.3.7. Geographical
Analysis
10.3.7.1. Most Active Players: Regional
Analysis by Number of Partnerships
10.3.7.2. Intercontinental and Intracontinental
Agreements
11. MARKET
SIZING AND OPPORTUNITY ANALYSIS
11.1. Chapter
Overview
11.2. Key
Assumptions and Forecast Methodology
11.3. Overall
Targeted Protein Degradation-based Therapeutics and Technologies Market,
2020-2030
11.3.1. Targeted
Protein Degradation-based Therapeutics and Technologies Market by Upfront
Payments, 2020-2030
11.3.2. Targeted
Protein Degradation-based Therapeutics and Technologies Market by Milestone
Payments, 2020-2030
11.3.3. Targeted
Protein Degradation-based Therapeutics and Technologies Market: Distribution by
Type of Protein Degrader
11.3.3.1. Targeted
Protein Degradation-based Therapeutics and Technologies Market for Degronimids,
2020-2030
11.3.3.2. Targeted
Protein Degradation-based Therapeutics and Technologies Market for PROTACs,
2020-2030
11.3.3.3. Targeted
Protein Degradation-based Therapeutics and Technologies Market for SARDs /
SERDs, 2020-2030
11.3.3.4. Targeted
Protein Degradation-based Therapeutics and Technologies Market for Specific BET
and DUB Inhibitors, 2020-2030
11.3.3.5. Targeted
Protein Degradation-based Therapeutics and Technologies Market for Other
Protein Degraders, 2020-2030
11.3.4. Targeted
Protein Degradation-based Therapeutics and Technologies Market: Distribution by
Therapeutic Area
11.3.4.1. Targeted
Protein Degradation-based Therapeutics and Technologies Market for
Neurodegenerative Disorders, 2020-2030
11.3.4.2. Targeted
Protein Degradation-based Therapeutics and Technologies Market for Oncological
Disorders, 2020-2030
11.3.4.3. Targeted
Protein Degradation-based Therapeutics and Technologies Market for Other
Therapeutic Areas, 2020-2030
11.3.5. Targeted
Protein Degradation-based Therapeutics and Technologies Market: Distribution by
Route of Administration
11.3.5.1. Targeted
Protein Degradation-based Therapeutics and Technologies Market for Oral Route,
2020-2030
11.3.5.2. Targeted
Protein Degradation-based Therapeutics and Technologies Market for Intravenous
Route, 2020-2030
11.3.5.3. Targeted
Protein Degradation-based Therapeutics and Technologies Market for Other
Routes, 2020-2030
11.3.6. Targeted
Protein Degradation-based Therapeutics and Technologies Market: Distribution by
Geography
11.3.6.1. Targeted
Protein Degradation-based Therapeutics and Technologies Market in North
America, 2020-2030
11.3.6.2. Targeted
Protein Degradation-based Therapeutics and Technologies Market in Europe,
2020-2030
11.3.6.3. Targeted
Protein Degradation-based Therapeutics and Technologies Market in Asia-Pacific,
2020-2030
13. CONCLUDING
REMARKS
13.1. Chapter Overview
13.2. Key Takeaways
14.
APPENDIX 1: TABULATED
DATA
15.
APPENDIX 2: LIST OF COMPANIES
AND ORGANIZATIONS
Contact Details
Gaurav Chaudhary
+1 (415) 800 3415
gaurav.chaudhary@rootsanalysis.com
