Reviewing retro video games is different in many ways from reviewing traditional video games. In general, a review of video games is written as close as possible before publication, in order to maximize interest in the topic in order to make the most of this article. Comparisons and observations in the review of simple video games are made taking into account the current game mechanics and growth expectations in the video game industry. But when it comes to retro games, you have to be willing to make a lot of sacrifices and be able to live in the present and the past.
Before Writing a Review
Before writing a review of a retro game, you need to ask yourself why you want to write it in the first place. To popularize the video game you remember from your childhood? To show how far video games have come since the 80s? Retro games critics are no different than historians. We carefully examine each name found and take into account the social, political, and economic environment at the time the title was produced. In addition, we will retrospectively examine developments in the field to find out who did what and how we got to where we are today.
Niche
The intended location is very small because there is little opportunity to track it, as they are products that are usually unsold and may not be sold for ten years. March enthusiasts should be prepared to receive a lot of criticism and praise from an extremely passionate and very eccentric demographic.
So let’s say you have the initiative or the ability to do whatever it takes, how exactly do you write a retro game review? As with almost all areas of journalism, in most cases you can do it as much as you want. However, you can consider a few points to make the writing process easier. So, without hesitation, here are some tips on writing a retro game review.
Star Rating System
Avoid simple digital or asterisk rating systems. You are usually only looking at content that is historically relevant, and so any assessment you can give the game is largely arbitrary. Once upon a time in the past, a game may have been 10 out of 10 or less than D, but by today’s standards it can be considered impressive or at a very bad age.
Outside of the game, learn about the game itself. What’s remarkable about its release. Who developed it and who was the president of the company at that time? Does the game mean competing with another company’s game?
Verdict
Give the reader a story that is interesting enough not to rush into your origins. After all, if they wanted to know everything about it, they would have gone to Wikipedia. The story is enough to tell the reader why it belongs in the field. Use terms and descriptions that a player who has never played this game will understand. Use the terminology used by most players.
