Gaussian units constitute a metric system of physical units. This system is the most common of the several electromagnetic unit systems based on cgs (centimetre–gram–second) units. It is also called the Gaussian unit system, Gaussian-cgs units, or often just cgs units. The term "cgs units" is ambiguous and therefore to be avoided if possible: there are several variants of cgs with conflicting definitions of electromagnetic quantities and units.
SI units predominate in most fields, and continue to increase in popularity at the expense of Gaussian units. Alternative unit systems also exist. Conversions between quantities in Gaussian and SI units are not direct unit conversions, because the quantities themselves are defined differently in each system. This means that the equations expressing physical laws of electromagnetism—such as Maxwell's—will change depending on the system of units employed. As an example, quantities that are dimensionless in one system may have dimension in the other.
Gaussian units existed before the CGS system. The British Association report of 1873 that proposed the CGS contains gaussian units derived from the foot–grain–second and metre–gram–second as well. There are also references to foot–pound–second gaussian units.
SI units are by far the most common system of units today. In engineering and practical areas, SI is nearly universal and has been for decades. In technical, scientific literature (such as theoretical physics and astronomy), Gaussian units were predominant until recent decades, but are now getting progressively less so. The 8th SI Brochure acknowledges that the CGS-Gaussian unit system has advantages in classical and relativistic electrodynamics, but the 9th SI Brochure makes no mention of CGS systems.
Major differences between Gaussian and SI unitsEdit
"Rationalized" unit systemsEdit
One difference between Gaussian and SI units is in the factors of 4π in various formulas. SI electromagnetic units are called "rationalized", because Maxwell's equations have no explicit factors of 4π in the formulae. On the other hand, the inverse-square force laws – Coulomb's law and the Biot–Savart law – do have a factor of 4π attached to the r2. In unrationalized Gaussian units (not Lorentz–Heaviside units) the situation is reversed: two of Maxwell's equations have factors of 4π in the formulas, while both of the inverse-square force laws, Coulomb's law and the Biot–Savart law, have no factor of 4π attached to r2 in the denominator.
A major difference between Gaussian and SI systems is in the respective definitions of the of charge quantity. In SI, a separate base unit (the ampere) is associated with electromagnetic phenomena, with the consequence that a unit of electrical charge (1 coulomb = 1 ampere × 1 second) is a physical quantity that cannot be expressed purely in terms of the mechanical units (kilogram, metre, second). On the other hand, in the Gaussian system, the unit of electrical charge (the statcoulomb, statC) can be written entirely as a dimensional combination of the mechanical units (gram, centimetre, second), as:
where F is the repulsive force between two electrical charges, QG 1 and QG 2 are the two charges in question, and r is the distance separating them. If QG 1 and QG 2 are expressed in statC and r in cm, then the unit of F that is coherent with these units is the dyne.
The same law in SI units is:
where ε0 is the vacuum permittivity, a quantity that is not dimensionless, namely (charge)2 (time)2 (mass)−1 (length)−3. Without ε0, the equation would be dimensionally inconsistent with the SI quantities, whereas the quantity ε0 does not appear in Gaussian equations. This is an example of how some dimensional physical constants can be eliminated from the expressions of physical law by the choice of quantities. In SI, 1/ε0, converts or scales flux density, D, to the corresponding electric field, E (the latter has dimension of force per charge), while in Gaussian units, electric flux density is the same quantity as electric field strength in free space aside from a dimensionless constant factor.
In Gaussian units, the speed of lightc appears explicitly in electromagnetic formulas like Maxwell's equations (see below), whereas in SI it appears via the product .
Units for magnetismEdit
In Gaussian units, unlike SI units, the electric field EG and the magnetic fieldBG have the same dimension. This amounts to a factor of c between how B is defined in the two unit systems, on top of the other differences. (The same factor applies to other magnetic quantities such as H and M.) For example, in a planar light wave in vacuum, |EG(r, t)| = |BG(r, t)| in Gaussian units, while |ESI(r, t)| = c |BSI(r, t)| in SI units.
There are further differences between Gaussian and SI units in how quantities related to polarization and magnetization are defined. For one thing, in Gaussian units, all of the following quantities have the same dimension: EG, DG, PG, BG, HG, and MG. Another important point is that the electric and magnetic susceptibility of a material is dimensionless in both Gaussian and SI units, but a given material will have a different numerical susceptibility in the two systems. (Equation is given below.)
List of equationsEdit
This section has a list of the basic formulae of electromagnetism, given in both Gaussian and International System of Quantities (ISQ). Most symbol names are not given; for complete explanations and definitions, please click to the appropriate dedicated article for each equation. A simple conversion scheme for use when tables are not available may be found in
All formulas except otherwise noted are from Ref.
Here are Maxwell's equations, both in macroscopic and microscopic forms. Only the "differential form" of the equations is given, not the "integral form"; to get the integral forms apply the divergence theorem or Kelvin–Stokes theorem.
Below are the expressions for the various fields in a dielectric medium. It is assumed here for simplicity that the medium is homogeneous, linear, isotropic, and nondispersive, so that the permittivity is a simple constant.
The quantities and are both dimensionless, and they have the same numeric value. By contrast, the electric susceptibility and are both unitless, but have different numeric values for the same material:
Next, here are the expressions for the various fields in a magnetic medium. Again, it is assumed that the medium is homogeneous, linear, isotropic, and nondispersive, so that the permeability is a simple constant.
The quantities and are both dimensionless, and they have the same numeric value. By contrast, the magnetic susceptibility and are both unitless, but has different numeric values in the two systems for the same material:
Vector and scalar potentialsEdit
The electric and magnetic fields can be written in terms of a vector potential A and a scalar potential φ:
The conversion factors are written both symbolically and numerically. The numerical conversion factors can be derived from the symbolic conversion factors by dimensional analysis. For example, the top row says , a relation which can be verified with dimensional analysis, by expanding and C in SI base units, and expanding Fr in Gaussian base units.
It is surprising to think of measuring capacitance in centimetres. One useful example is that a centimetre of capacitance is the capacitance between a sphere of radius 1 cm in vacuum and infinity.
Another surprising unit is measuring resistivity in units of seconds. A physical example is: Take a parallel-plate capacitor, which has a "leaky" dielectric with permittivity 1 but a finite resistivity. After charging it up, the capacitor will discharge itself over time, due to current leaking through the dielectric. If the resistivity of the dielectric is "X" seconds, the half-life of the discharge is ~0.05X seconds. This result is independent of the size, shape, and charge of the capacitor, and therefore this example illuminates the fundamental connection between resistivity and time units.
Dimensionally equivalent unitsEdit
A number of the units defined by the table have different names but are in fact dimensionally equivalent – i.e., they have the same expression in terms of the base units cm, g, s. (This is analogous to the distinction in SI between becquerel and Hz, or between newton-metre and joule.) The different names help avoid ambiguities and misunderstandings as to what physical quantity is being measured. In particular, all of the following quantities are dimensionally equivalent in Gaussian units, but they are nevertheless given different unit names as follows:
where r is distance, and the "SI" subscripts indicate that the electric field and charge are defined using SI definitions. If we want the formula to instead use the Gaussian definitions of electric field and charge, we look up how these are related using Table 1, which says:
Therefore, after substituting and simplifying, we get the Gaussian-units formula:
which is the correct Gaussian-units formula, as mentioned in a previous section.
For convenience, the table below has a compilation of the symbolic conversion factors from Table 1. To convert any formula from Gaussian units to SI units using this table, replace each symbol in the Gaussian column by the corresponding expression in the SI column (vice versa to convert the other way). This will reproduce any of the specific formulas given in the list above, such as Maxwell's equations, as well as any other formula not listed. For some examples of how to use this table, see:
Table 2A: Replacement rules for translating formulas from Gaussian to SI
^ abFor example, one widely used graduate electromagnetism textbook is Classical Electrodynamics by J.D. Jackson. The second edition, published in 1975, used Gaussian units exclusively, but the third edition, published in 1998, uses mostly SI units. Similarly, Electricity and Magnetism by Edward Purcell is a popular undergraduate textbook. The second edition, published in 1984, used Gaussian units, while the third edition, published in 2013, switched to SI units.