The use of factorials is documented since the Talmudic period (200 to 500 CE), one of the earliest examples being the Hebrew Book of Creation Sefer Yetzirah which lists factorials (up to 7!) as a means of counting permutations. Indian scholars have been using factorial formulas since at least the 12th century.Siddhānta Shiromani by Bhāskara II (c. 1114–1185) mentioned factorials for permutations in Volume I, the Līlāvatī. Fabian Stedman later described factorials as applied to change ringing, a musical art involving the ringing of several tuned bells. After describing a recursive approach, Stedman gives a statement of a factorial (using the language of the original):
Now the nature of these methods is such, that the changes on one number comprehends [includes] the changes on all lesser numbers ... insomuch that a compleat Peal of changes on one number seemeth to be formed by uniting of the compleat Peals on all lesser numbers into one entire body.
There are several motivations for this definition:
For n = 0, the definition of n! as a product involves the product of no numbers at all, and so is an example of the broader convention that the product of no factors is equal to the multiplicative identity (see Empty product).
There is exactly one permutation of zero objects (with nothing to permute, the only rearrangement is to do nothing).
More generally, the number of ways to choose all n elements among a set of n is:
It allows for the compact expression of many formulae, such as the exponential function, as a power series:
It extends the recurrence relation to 0.
It matches the gamma function .
Although the factorial function has its roots in combinatorics, formulas involving factorials occur in many areas of mathematics.
There are n! different ways of arranging n distinct objects into a sequence, the permutations of those objects.
Often factorials appear in the denominator of a formula to account for the fact that ordering is to be ignored. A classical example is counting k-combinations (subsets of k elements) from a set with n elements. One can obtain such a combination by choosing a k-permutation: successively selecting and removing one element of the set, k times, for a total of
possibilities. This, however, produces the k-combinations in a particular order that one wishes to ignore; since each k-combination is obtained in k! different ways, the correct number of k-combinations is
Factorials also turn up in calculus; for example, they occur in the denominators of the terms of Taylor's formula, where they are used as compensation terms due to the nth derivative of xn being equivalent to n!.
The graph of the function f(n) = ln n! is shown in the figure on the right. It looks approximately linear for all reasonable values of n, but this intuition is false. We get one of the simplest approximations for ln n! by bounding the sum with an integral from above and below as follows:
Both this and Stirling's approximation give a relative error on the order of 1/n3, but Ramanujan's is about four times more accurate. However, if we use two correction terms in a Stirling-type approximation, as with Ramanujan's approximation, the relative error will be of order 1/n5:
If efficiency is not a concern, computing factorials is trivial from an algorithmic point of view: successively multiplying a variable initialized to 1 by the integers up to n (if any) will compute n!, provided the result fits in the variable. In functional languages, the recursive definition is often implemented directly to illustrate recursive functions.
The main practical difficulty in computing factorials is the size of the result. To assure that the exact result will fit for all legal values of even the smallest commonly used integral type (8-bit signed integers) would require more than 700 bits, so no reasonable specification of a factorial function using fixed-size types can avoid questions of overflow. The values 12! and 20! are the largest factorials that can be stored in, respectively, the 32-bit and 64-bit integers commonly used in personal computers, however many languages support variable length integer types capable of calculating very large values.Floating-point representation of an approximated result allows going a bit further, but this also remains quite limited by possible overflow. Most calculators use scientific notation with 2-digit decimal exponents, and the largest factorial that fits is then 69!, because 69! < 10100 < 70!. Other implementations (such as computer software such as spreadsheet programs) can often handle larger values.
If the exact values of large factorials are needed, they can be computed using arbitrary-precision arithmetic. Instead of doing the sequential multiplications ((1 × 2) × 3) × 4..., a program can partition the sequence into two parts, whose products are roughly the same size, and multiply them using a divide-and-conquer method. This is often more efficient.
The asymptotically best efficiency is obtained by computing n! from its prime factorization. As documented by Peter Borwein, prime factorization allows n! to be computed in time O(n(log n log log n)2), provided that a fast multiplication algorithm is used (for example, the Schönhage–Strassen algorithm). Peter Luschny presents source code and benchmarks for several efficient factorial algorithms, with or without the use of a prime sieve.
Legendre's formula gives the multiplicity of the prime p occurring in the prime factorization of n! as
where sp(n) denotes the sum of the standard base-p digits of n.
Adding 1 to a factorial n! yields a number that is only divisible by primes that are larger than n. This fact can be used to prove Euclid's theorem that the number of primes is infinite. Primes of the form n! ± 1 are called factorial primes.
The gamma function interpolates the factorial function to non-integer values. The main clue is the recurrence relation generalized to a continuous domain.
Besides nonnegative integers, the factorial can also be defined for non-integer values, but this requires more advanced tools from mathematical analysis.
One function that fills in the values of the factorial (but with a shift of 1 in the argument), that is often used, is called the gamma function, denoted Γ(z). It is defined for all complex numbers z except for the non-positive integers, and given when the real part of z is positive by
Its relation to the factorial is that n! = Γ(n + 1) for every nonnegative integer n.
Euler's original formula for the gamma function was
Carl Friedrich Gauss used the notation Π(z) to denote the same function, but with argument shifted by 1, so that it agrees with the factorial for nonnegative integers. This pi function is defined by
The pi function and gamma function are related by the formula Π(z) = Γ(z + 1). Likewise, Π(n) = n! for any nonnegative integer n.
The factorial function, generalized to all real numbers except negative integers. For example, 0! = 1! = 1, (−1/2)! = √π, 1/2! = √π/2.
In addition to this, the pi function satisfies the same recurrence as factorials do, but at every complex value z where it is defined
This is no longer a recurrence relation but a functional equation. In terms of the gamma function, it is
The values of these functions at half-integer values is therefore determined by a single one of them:
from which it follows that for n ∈ N,
It also follows that for n ∈ N,
The pi function is certainly not the only way to extend factorials to a function defined at almost all complex values, and not even the only one that is analytic wherever it is defined. Nonetheless it is usually considered the most natural way to extend the values of the factorials to a complex function. For instance, the Bohr–Mollerup theorem states that the gamma function is the only function that takes the value 1 at 1, satisfies the functional equation Γ(n + 1) = nΓ(n), is meromorphic on the complex numbers, and is log-convex on the positive real axis. A similar statement holds for the pi function as well, using the Π(n) = nΠ(n − 1) functional equation.
However, there exist complex functions that are probably simpler in the sense of analytic function theory and which interpolate the factorial values. For example, Hadamard's 'gamma' function (Hadamard 1894) harv error: no target: CITEREFHadamard1894 (help) which, unlike the gamma function, is an entire function.
Euler also developed a convergent product approximation for the non-integer factorials, which can be seen to be equivalent to the formula for the gamma function above:
However, this formula does not provide a practical means of computing the pi function or the gamma function, as its rate of convergence is slow.
Amplitude and phase of factorial of complex argument
Representation through the gamma function allows evaluation of factorial of complex argument. Equilines of amplitude and phase of factorial are shown in figure. Let
Several levels of constant modulus (amplitude) ρ and constant phase φ are shown. The grid covers the range −3 ≤ x ≤ 3, −2 ≤ y ≤ 2, with unit steps. The scratched line shows the level φ = ±π.
Thin lines show intermediate levels of constant modulus and constant phase. At the poles at every negative integer, phase and amplitude are not defined. Equilines are dense in vicinity of singularities along negative integer values of the argument.
For the large values of the argument, the factorial can be approximated through the logarithm of the gamma function, using a continued fraction representation. This approach is due to T. J. Stieltjes (1894). Writing
The continued fraction converges iff . The convergence is poor in the vicinity of the imaginary axis. When , the six coefficients above are sufficient for the evaluation of the factorial with complex double precision. For higher precision more coefficients can be computed by a rational QD scheme (Rutishauser's QD algorithm).
Non-extendability to negative integers
The relation n! = n × (n − 1)! allows one to compute the factorial for an integer given the factorial for a smaller integer. The relation can be inverted so that one can compute the factorial for an integer given the factorial for a larger integer:
However, this recursion does not permit us to compute the factorial of a negative integer; use of the formula to compute (−1)! would require a division of a nonzero value by zero, and thus blocks us from computing a factorial value for every negative integer. Similarly, the gamma function is not defined for zero or negative integers, though it is defined for all other complex numbers.
Factorial-like products and functions
There are several other integer sequences similar to the factorial that are used in mathematics:
The notation is sometimes used to represent the product of the n integers counting up to and including x (i.e. ).
A common related notation is to use multiple exclamation points to denote a multifactorial, the product of integers in steps of two (n!!), three (n!!!), or more (see generalizations of the double factorial). The double factorial is the most commonly used variant, but one can similarly define the triple factorial (n!!!) and so on. One can define the k-tuple factorial, denoted by n!(k), recursively for positive integers as
In addition, similarly to 0! = 1!/1 = 1, one can define:
For sufficiently large n ≥ 1, the ordinary single factorial function is expanded through the multifactorial functions as follows:
In the same way that n! is not defined for negative integers, and n!! is not defined for negative even integers, n!(k) is not defined for negative integers divisible by k.
The primorial of a natural number n (sequence A002110 in the OEIS), denoted n#, is similar to the factorial, but with the product taken only over the prime numbers less than or equal to n. That is,
where p ranges over the prime numbers less than or equal to n. For example, the primorial of 11 is
The compositorial of a natural number n (sequence A036691 in the OEIS) is similar to the factorial, but with the product taken only over the composite numbers less than or equal to n. For example, the compositorial of 11 is
The fibonorial is the product of the first n positive Fibonacci numbers.
The sequence of fibonorials starts as
1, 1, 1, 2, 6, 30, 240, 3120, 65520,... (sequence A003266 in the OEIS)
The subfactorial yields the number of derangements of a set of objects. Its value is:
where and "nint" denotes the function which rounds its input to the nearest integer (there will never be any ambiguity/ties in this case because is always an integer and is an algebraically-independent transcendental, namely the natural base/Euler's number).
Neil Sloane and Simon Plouffe defined a superfactorial in The Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences (Academic Press, 1995) to be the product of the first n factorials. So the superfactorial of 4 is
Equivalently, the superfactorial is given by the formula
Occasionally the hyperfactorial of n is considered. It is written as H(n) and defined by
For n = 1, 2, 3, 4,... the values of H(n) are 1, 4, 108, 27648,... (sequence A002109 in the OEIS).
The asymptotic growth rate is
where A = 1.2824... is the Glaisher–Kinkelin constant.H(14) ≈ 1.8474×1099 is already almost equal to a googol, and H(15) ≈ 8.0896×10116 is almost of the same magnitude as the Shannon number, the theoretical number of possible chess games. Compared to the Pickover definition of the superfactorial, the hyperfactorial grows relatively slowly.
The hyperfactorial function can be generalized to complex numbers in a similar way as the factorial function. The resulting function is called the K-function.
^ abKnuth, Donald E. (1997). The Art of Computer Programming: Volume 1: Fundamental Algorithms. Addison-Wesley Professional. ISBN 9780321635747.
^"18.01 Single Variable Calculus, Lecture 37: Taylor Series". MIT OpenCourseWare. Fall 2006. Archived from the original on 2018-04-26. Retrieved 2017-05-03.
^Kardar, Mehran (2007). "Chapter 2: Probability". Statistical Physics of Particles. Cambridge University Press. pp. 35–56. ISBN 9780521873420.
^"18.01 Single Variable Calculus, Lecture 4: Chain rule, higher derivatives". MIT OpenCourseWare. Fall 2006. Archived from the original on 2018-04-26. Retrieved 2017-05-03.
^Impens, Chris (2003), "Stirling's series made easy", American Mathematical Monthly, 110 (8): 730–735, doi:10.2307/3647856, hdl:1854/LU-284957, JSTOR 3647856, MR 2024001; see in particular the inequality on p. 732 showing that the relative error is at most .
^"wesselbosman/nFactorial". GitHub. 2017-12-25. Archived from the original on 26 April 2018. Retrieved 26 April 2018.
^"Factorial Algorithm". GNU MP Software Manual. Archived from the original on 2013-03-14. Retrieved 2013-01-22.
^Borwein, Peter (1985). "On the Complexity of Calculating Factorials". Journal of Algorithms. 6 (3): 376–380. doi:10.1016/0196-6774(85)90006-9.
^Luschny, Peter. "Fast-Factorial-Functions: The Homepage of Factorial Algorithms". Archived from the original on 2005-03-05.
Higgins, Peter (2008), Number Story: From Counting to Cryptography, New York: Copernicus, ISBN 978-1-84800-000-1
Stedman, Fabian (1677), Campanalogia, London The publisher is given as "W.S." who may have been William Smith, possibly acting as agent for the Society of College Youths, to which society the "Dedicatory" is addressed.
Hadamard, M. J. (1968) , "Sur L'Expression Du Produit 1·2·3· · · · ·(n−1) Par Une Fonction Entière" (PDF), Œuvres de Jacques Hadamard (in French), Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifiques
Ramanujan, Srinivasa (1988), The Lost Notebook and Other Unpublished Papers, Springer Berlin, p. 339, ISBN 3-540-18726-X
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Factorial (function).